Feedback

Questions? Comments? Feedback?

We’d like to hear from you! Please comment below and we will get back to you promptly.

Best, Johns Hopkins Pathology

View updates log from April-May 2016

38 thoughts on “Feedback”

  1. Why you have stoped new cases for cytology and Histopathology cases. Please don’t stop it as John Hopkins is the best university in the world , these sites are the best learning sites in the world. Please also start cervical cytology cases. You can’t imagine how big these sites are for us.

  2. Now, last week march 2024, whitout your now famous world bridge, how is modified your life and work ?
    Go go ahead !

  3. Congratulations to all the Anatomic Pathology Team of JHH for having resumed your weeklySUC sessions:
    Your teaching and phylantropic work is of inchalculable and immeasurablE valour .
    THANK YOU VERY MUCH TO THE DR RUBAN DIRECTOR AND THE ALL PATHOLOCI TEAM FOR YOUR WORK AT THE LAST TWENTY YEARS !!!

  4. Hello,

    Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. The discussion for cases 731-2 and 731-3 has been corrected.

    Best,
    sp Unknowns Team

  5. Hi Dr. Baewer,
    Thanks for your comment. We do not have a searchable public database for the unknowns slides. However, if there are any specific cases that you would like to confirm the diagnosis on, you can provide us with the case number and we can look for you.
    Best,
    sp Unknowns Team

  6. Hi Dr. Ramachandran,
    Thank you for letting us know of the problem.
    This issue is now fixed.

    Best regards, Johns Hopkins Pathology

  7. Ms. Jamie, the pictures are now showing in Week 332 case 5. Please let us know if you still can’t view them. thanks!

  8. Hi Ambereen- Thank you for your comment. This mistake has been corrected in the case you mention.
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  9. Hi Ambereen– We have corrected Week 269 Case 4 to read ‘endometrial’ after conferring with the author of the case. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Feel free to submit any other suggestions that you have.
    Thank you,
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  10. Hi IDA,
    Thank you for your comment. We are glad that you find this site useful. We will consider your request.

    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  11. Our server has been restarted and the images are now available. Sorry for the inconvenience.

  12. Our server is down right now, and we’ll let you know as soon as we got our server up and running.
    Thanks for emailing us!

  13. Thank you so much for letting us know. We have fixed the problem, the images for weeks 551 and 553 are now available.

  14. We are a bunch of pathologists waiting and wishing their excellent philanthropies and new teachings

    Thank you very much for all your previous, continuous, long-lasting and prolonged teachings

    josemari arrinda

  15. Hello..
    In week 663 case 3, the polypoid lesion is projecting into urethra or ureter?
    Thank you

  16. Hello Josemari,
    Thank you so much for visiting our site, and we are glad you find the cases interesting. The pathogenesis of light chain deposition disease is similar to amyloid light-chain amyloidosis, but the light chain proteins do not form amyloid deposits; the reason for this, at least to our knowledge, is not understood. Thus, the Congo red stain is negative. In this case, nearly all the plasma cells showed kappa restriction, which confirmed the diagnosis. Thanks for your time and take care!
    Tasha Larman

  17. Thank you very much for all Pathologia Team of J.H.H, for these two new week 6 cases, there are very interesting
    But I have one big doubt, what´s your explication for understoold the negativity of Congo Red stain at the material of last case of that serie ??
    That material also not stain with Lights chains Kappa or Lambda ??

    Thank you for the feedback

    beste wishes
    Josemari

  18. This problem has been resolved. Please let us know if you experience any issues in the future. Thank you.

  19. Thank you for your comment. We are in middle of resolving this issue. We will let you know when the issue has been resolved.
    JHU Pathology Web Team

  20. Hello Mohammad. Week 189 case 2 was indeed missing images, and we’ve resolved this problem. Sorry for the inconvenience.
    Thanks!

  21. Hello everyone, The Search Cases page should be back up and running. The issue has been addressed and now resolved. So sorry for the inconvenience.

  22. Thank you for e-mailing us. We are currently looking into this issue and will reply when it’s resolved.

  23. Hi Miguel. Week 579 was indeed missing images, and we’ve resolved this problem. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

    Best, Johns Hopkins Pathology

  24. Hi Yongjie. Thank you for your feedback.
    Is JavaScript turned on in your browser? Viewing images on those cases requires JavaScript and the entire site requires JavaScript to function properly.

    Let us know if you continue to run into problems.
    Best, Johns Hopkins Pathology

  25. Hi Miguel. Thanks for letting us know. We are looking into this. Please let us know if there are any others that you can’t see.

    Best, Johns Hopkins Pathology

  26. This feature is being added to the site. All future immunohistochemistry pictures will be marked.
    Thank you for your input.
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  27. This feature is being added to the site. All future immunohistochemistry pictures will be marked.
    Thank you for your input.
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  28. Hi CD,
    This feature has been improved and the cases now require less clicks. We hope that this has helped make the site more useful to you.

    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  29. Hi CD. The upgrade that you request is in progress.
    Thanks for your feedback.
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  30. We’re not finished implementing all the proposed changes yet, but we’re glad to hear that the site updates are making the site more useful to you.
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  31. Hi Stuart. Thanks very much for your input. We are looking at the functionality of this site and taking your comments and the comments of other users into consideration.
    Stay tuned!

    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  32. 1. Please explain what you mean when you say “does not provide discussion”.
    2. Are you looking for the different categories of cases? Choosing a category lists the cases for that category.

    Your input is much appreciated. We appreciate your patience as we work to approve the features on this website.
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  33. Like on the old site, you may search for cases by entering a diagnosis in the search bar and all cases whose diagnosis contain that term will be returned.
    For more details on advanced searches, see advanced searching.
    Thank you,
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

  34. Hi Claire.
    As mentioned in previous comments, we are in the process of bringing this website to its final state. We appreciate your input and comments and will think about integrating these features into the new website.
    As of now, those features will not be available for a few months.
    Thanks very much.
    Johns Hopkins Pathology

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *